SAMPLE CASE · FICTITIOUS
Fictitious document · for teaching purposes

Sample case: a 3,050-employee supplier facing the dual disruption of AI + the EV transition.

A company invented to show the method: 18 months to avoid a forced redundancy plan (PSE), without the data to defend it before the works council (CSE). How a typical engagement would unfold, in 7 chapters, over 5 months.

Book 30 min · demo on your rolesDiscover Skillberg Intelligence
00 · The brief

A tier-2 supplier in the middle of a technology shift.

MétallEst makes powertrain parts (casings, links, engine mounts) at three sites in the Hauts-de-France region. Customers: three European automakers (40%, 25% and 15% of revenue). 2024 executive committee roadmap: shift the combustion/EV mix from 75/25 to 25/75 by 2030.

3,050
Total FTEs
€480M
2025 revenue
3 + 1
3 plants + HQ
75 / 25
Combustion / EV mix
~8%
2025 EBITDA
1962
Year founded
The challenge · Three pressures

Three timelines converge on the CHRO's desk.

At least 1,200 people affected over 5 years — 800 by the EV transition, 400 by AI. Each pressure comes with its own risk metric and its own owner on the executive committee.

01 · Industrial

EV transition

800 FTEs

40% of combustion part numbers disappear. The 75/25 → 25/75 shift is mandated by the executive committee plan.

2030 horizon
02 · Regulatory

EU AI Act

400 FTEs

Affected by algorithmic HR decisions (ATS deployed in 2024). Art. 99 penalty of up to 3% of global revenue (€15M).

Deadline · Dec. 2, 2027
03 · Labor relations

September works council (CSE)

6 months

To produce a costed, defensible and auditable plan. Tense labor climate, under mediation by the prefect.

Deadline · September 24, 2026

“We have 18 months to avoid a forced redundancy plan.
And we don't have the data to defend it before the works council.”

Sophie Marchand · CHRO, MétallEst · first call, March 14, 2026
The method · 7 chapters

A scientific method, powered by our own graph.

From scoping to measured impact, each phase draws on the 7 technical layers of the Skillberg graph (L1 → L7), to produce a plan traceable back to the originating node.

00

The brief

Context, pain point and scope. How MétallEst came to Skillberg.

01

Scoping & audit

12 incumbents · time allocation · 89% mapped onto the knowledge graph.

02

Population scan

Heatmap of 3,050 employees · 7 cohorts · breakdown of the Buyer job.

03

Field deep-dive

Combustion CNC operator · dual disruption · observation + 3 vignettes.

04

Pathway design

P_success formula · 5 + 7 pathways · 84% internal absorption targeted.

05

Business case & ROI

€10M in net savings · 3 sensitivity scenarios · AI Act audit trail.

06

Handoff & continuity

Works council on Sept. 24 · audit-trail demo · HR team moves to self-service on the API.

07

6 months later

Measured impact · incumbent testimonials · and 3 cases that didn't work.

Orders of magnitude · illustrative

What a costed plan lets you defend.

In this sample case, the engagement would turn a blurry picture (“at least 1,200 people affected”) into an operational plan — costed and compliant, ready to present to the works council and for HR teams to run.

€10M
in net savings
vs. a redundancy plan · 3 sensitivity scenarios
84%
internal absorption
of affected roles, with no forced departures
7 / 11
works council votes in favor
costed, defensible, auditable plan
100%
AI Act audit trail
every HR decision traceable to the node

Your case could be next.

Transition, AI Act compliance, labor relations: we turn HR uncertainty into a costed, auditable plan. Pricing depends on the number of jobs covered.

Book 30 min · demo on your rolesSee Skillberg Intelligence

Fictitious sample case, for teaching purposes · Skillberg Intelligence